Non-Nuclear Weapons and Strategic Stability in Europe
Towards a Common Understanding of the Risks and Threats to Safety, Security and Sustainability in Outer Space
The Fondation pour la recherche stratégique (FRS) organised the second part of a virtual EUNPDC Ad hoc seminar on “Towards a common understanding of the risks and threats to safety, […]
Find out more »- Beyza Unal, Deputy Director, International Security Department, Chatham House
- Ajey Lele, Senior Fellow at Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
- Tal Inbar, Former Head of the Space Research Center, Fisher Institute
- Guoyu Wang, Dean of Academy of Air, Space Policy and Law, Beijing Institute of Technology
- Setsuko Aoki, Professor of Law, Keio University Law School
- Raja Qaiser Ahmed, Assistant Professor, School of Politics and International Relations, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad
- Laura Grego, Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, Laboratory for Nuclear Security and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Towards a Common Understanding of the Risks and Threats to Safety, Security and Sustainability in Outer Space (Part 1 – virtual)
The Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique organised a virtual EUNPDC Ad hoc seminar on “Towards a Common Understanding of the risks and threats to safety, Security and sustainability in Outer […]
Find out more »- Rajagopalan Rajeswari Pillai, Director of the Centre for Security, Strategy and Technology, Observer Research Foundation (ORF)
- Hubert Foy, Director & Senior Research Scientist, African Center for Science and International Security (AFRICSIS)
- Annette Froehlich, Honorary Adjunct Senior Lecturer at the University of Cape Town
- Almudena Azcárate Ortega, Associate Researcher, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Other Strategic Weapons, UNIDIR
- Kazuto Suzuki, Professor, Tokyo University
- Nivedita Raju, Associate Researcher, SIPRI
Considering potential lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic to strengthen the BTWC (Part 2 – virtual)
In view of the next Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), this high-level part of the Ad hoc seminar aimed to consider and determine the key […]
Find out more »- Elisande Nexon, Pharm.D, Senior Research Fellow, Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, France
- H.E. Ambassador Marjolijn van Deelen, EU Special Envoy for Non-proliferation and Disarmament
- Dr. Una Jakob, Research Associate, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Germany – Reporting from the expert workshop
- Sigurd Schelstraete, Director of the Department of Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Belgium
- Dr. Irmgard Adam, Policy officer, Permanent Representation of the Federal Republic of Germany to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva
- Elisande Nexon, Pharm.D, Senior Research Fellow, Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, France – Reporting from the expert workshop
- H.E. Ambassador Gianfranco Incarnato, Permanent Representative of Italy to the Conference on Disarmament
- H.E. Ambassador Yann Hwang, Permanent Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament
Considering potential lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic to strengthen the BTWC (Part 1 – virtual)
This expert seminar aims to consider and determine the key issues highlighted by the pandemic that could be relevant to the disarmament and non-proliferation scope of the Biological and Toxin […]
Find out more »Monday, 17 May 2021 |
- Elisande Nexon (Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, France)
- Mauri Pasanen (Disarmament, non-proliferation and arms export control, EEAS)
- James Revill (United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, Switzerland) - Current and future main challenges and perspectives for the BWC stemming from the pandemic
- Filippa Lentzos (Kings College London, United Kingdom) - Global health, research and dual use dilemma in the Covid-19 perspective
- Gunnar Jeremias (Hamburg University, Germany) - Potential impact of the pandemic on the BWC national implementation
- Tatyana Novossiolova (Centre for the Study of Democracy, Bulgaria) - Cross-sectorial awareness raising and education challenges and perspectives in life sciences
- Jean Pascal Zanders (The Trench / FRS, France) - Exploring the issue of emergency assistance in the framework of the BWC (reconsidering the reflections carried out until the pandemic)
- Alessandro Marcello (International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Italy) – Promoting capacity building through cooperation and assistance, the example of the ICGEB
- Anne-Sophie Lequarré (Service for Foreign Policy Instruments, stability and Peace, European Commission) - The contribution of EU CBRN Centres of Excellence to the COVID-19 response
- Antoine Flahault (Institute of Global Health, Switzerland) - Strengthening preparedness and response to international biological public health emergencies
- Daniel Feakes (BTWC Implementation Support Unit, UNODA, Geneva Branch)
Addressing illicit SALW and ammunition in conflict affected areas – The role for peace support operations (virtual)
The proliferation of illicit weapons, especially small arms and light weapons (SALW) and their ammunition, continues to contribute to armed violence, crime and instability especially in conflict affected areas. The […]
Find out more »Monday, 14 December 2020 |
- Ambassador Marjolijn van Deelen, Special Envoy on Disarmament and Non-proliferation and Head of the EEAS Disarmament Non-proliferation and Arms Export Control Division, EU
- Ms. Izumi Nakamitsu, Under-Secretary-General and High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, UN
- Mr. Benjamin Hautecouverture, Senior research fellow, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique/EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Consortium
- Ms. Katherine Prizeman, UNODA
- Mr. Jonah Leff, Conflict Armament Research
- Mr. Eric Berman, former Director, Small Arms Survey
- Savannah de Tessieres, UN consultant, former Coordinator of UN Libya Panel of Experts
- David Lochhead, ex-DPKO MINUSMA, UNMISS and UNMIS; Small Arms Survey
- ACOS CJ3 - OF5 Dionysios Mantadakis, EUNAVFOR MED IRINI, EU
Tuesday, 15 December 2020 |
- Alexander Ralf Riebl, UNMAS
- Nora Allgaier, DPO-ODA, UN
- Hardy Giezendanner, UNIDIR
- Lt Col (EL A) Odysseas Loukopoulos, C.2 - Crisis Response Planning and Current Operations, European External Action Service, EU
- Mr. Emile Le Brun, Small Arms Survey
- Wing Commander Samatha Gomani, DPO-Office of Military Affairs, Policy and Doctrine Division, UN
- Dr. Jovana Carapic, GICHD's Ammunition Management Advisory Team (AMAT)
- Mr. Alexandre Zouev, Assistant Secretary-General for Rule of Law and Security Institutions, UN
- Ms. Alison Weston, Head of Division - Partnerships and Agreements (SECDEFPOL.2), European External Action Service, EU
- Mr. Benjamin Hautecouverture, Senior research fellow, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique/EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Consortium
Strengthening Non-proliferation and Disarmament Education in Europe (Part I – virtual)
On 23 and 24 June 2020, SIPRI, on behalf of the EUNPD Consortium, organised a virtual event on Strengthening Non-proliferation and Disarmament (NPD) Education in Europe. The inperson event originally […]
Find out more »Security, Safety, Sustainability: Promoting Good Behaviour in Outer Space
Security, Safety, Sustainability: Promoting Good Behaviour in Outer Space Objective: Exchange of views and information on national, regional and global initiatives to promote the preservation of safe, secure and sustainable […]
Find out more »Mine Action Donor Strategies
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mine Action Donor Strategies – Lessons for the Revision of the EU Guidelines for Mine Action On 28 November 2018, the EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Consortium […]
Find out more »EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mine Action Donor Strategies – Lessons for the Revision of the EU Guidelines for Mine Action
On 28 November 2018, the EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Consortium organized an Ad-Hoc Seminar on Mine Action Donor Strategies – Lessons for the Revision of the EU Guidelines for Mine Action, which was held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on the margins of the 17th Meeting of the States Parties to the Mine-Ban Convention (the Ottawa Convention). The event brought together nearly 60 participants from States Parties to the Convention, the UN (UNMAS), the EU (EEAS, Commission), and the main NGOs in the field of Mine action. The objective of this Ad-Hoc Seminar was to collect lessons learned, views and inputs regarding Mine action donor strategies, with a view to feed the revision of the EU guidelines for Mine action. The EU is one of the world's top donors. EU's assistance is still led by the "guidelines for Mine action" dating from 2008 and which has to be revised. As a result, seven main donor countries explained their Mine action strategies (the UK, Germany, the USA, the Netherlands, Japan, Switzerland, Norway) along with key donors at regional (the EU) and global (the UNMAS) levels. Thanks to Afghanistan, Angola, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Colombia, the participants were provided with accurate lessons learned from the ground. Significant messages were sent to donor countries and operators. And exchanges with some of the more relevant operators helped European officials fuel the reflexion about the revision of the EU guidelines.Agenda
Tuesday, 27 November 2018
19:00 Welcome DinnerWednesday, 28 November 2018
08:15 – 08:45 Registration & Welcome Coffee 08:45 – 09:00 Introduction and Welcoming Remarks Ahmad Helal Atmar, Afghan presidency of the 17th Meeting of States Parties to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention Benjamin Hautecouverture, Senior research fellow, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique 09:00 – 11:00 Presentation of National Mine Action Donor Strategies Chair: Frank Meeussen, Policy officer, Disarmament, Non-Proliferation and Arms Export Control, SECPOL1, European External Action Service Speakers:- Elizabeth McGarva, Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Department, Department for International Development United Kingdom
- Ingrid Schøyen, Humanitarian Affiars, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Oliver Bräuner, Desk Officer, Europe and Humanitarian Mine Action, Federal Foreign Office Germany
- Steven Costner, Deputy Director, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State USA
- Koen Höcker, Directorate Stability & Humanitarian Aid, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Netherlands
- Alessandro Palmoso, Programme Officer, Human Security Division of the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland
- Jun Yamada, First Secretary, Defense Attaché, Delegation of Japan for the Conference on Disarmament, Geneva
- Agnès Marcaillou, Director, UN Mine Action Service
- Fotini Antonopoulou, Programme Manager in charge of Mine Action, Operations Section III, EU Delegation to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Asa Massleberg, Advisor, Strategic Management, Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining
- Tomaž Lovrenčič, Director, ITF Enhancing Human Security
- Adriano Gonçalves, Head, Cabinet of International Cooperation and Assistance, Angola
- Saša Obradović, Director, Bosnia and Herzegovina Mine Action Centre
- Miguel Ceballos, High Commisioner for Peace, Colombia
- Tim Kreuk, Head, Halo Trust Europe office
- Josephine Dresner, Country Representative, Mines Advisory Group
- Emmanuel Sauvage, Director, Armed Violence Reduction Unit, Handicap International
- Hans Risser, Head of Operations, NPA
- Steve Priestley, Director, MA Programs, Janus Global operations LLC
Man-portable air-defence systems (MANPADS)
Man-portable air-defence systems (MANPADS) On behalf of the EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Consortium, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) organised an ad-hoc workshop in Brussels on 27 November on the […]
Find out more »Man-portable air-defence systems (MANPADS)
On behalf of the EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Consortium, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) organised an ad-hoc workshop in Brussels on 27 November on the diversion risks of man-portable air-defence systems (MANPADS), attended by approximately 55 government officials and non-governmental experts from Europe and elsewhere. Jacek Bylica, European External Action Service Special Envoy for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, who had initiated the workshop, noted that MANPADs exemplify the interactive nature of the key threats identified in the European Agenda on Security: in this case, terrorism, organised crime and proliferation. The workshop addressed the level of risk, the level of awareness and the actions needed to alleviate risks. A technical session explained the history, design, components, use, and variations of MANPADS, more than one million of which have been produced in the last 50 years. Over the past decade, about 20,000 have been transferred, often with insufficient transparency. Some of these weapons can be used with little training and they can last for decades in the right climate conditions. Trade and diversion trends were explained, and the export controls that have introduced, including best practices promoted by the OSCE and the authorization system introduced by one company to prevent illicit use of its weapons. Briefings covered the situation in specific regions and conflict zones around the world, including northern Africa, the Levant, South America, eastern Africa, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe. While the situation in the Horn of Africa remains fraught, here are serious risks in Venezuela, where the unstable government has procured over 500 MANPADS launchers and dispersed them to 42 military units around the country, and in the Donbas region of Ukraine, where Russian-supported rebels have seized government stockpiles. Elsewhere, government secrecy is as much of a problem as capacity constraints in impeding the tracing of transfers.Agenda
Tuesday, 27 November 2018
08:45 – 09:00 Registration 09:00 – 09:15 Introductory remarks Jacek Bylica, Special Envoy for Disarmament and Non-proliferation, EEAS Mark Fitzpatrick, Director, Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Policy, IISS Part I: MANPADS global issues and responses These first two sessions will aim to address the following elements:- MANPADS basics:history, design, main components, use, variations
- MANPADS lifecycle, durability and longevity
- Expertise and training needed for effective operation.
- Numbers produced
- Trade and diversion trends
- Export controls
- Technical end-use control features
- Principles and best practices
- Ben Barry, Senior Fellow for Land Warfare, IISS
- Tomasz Brodniewicz, Head of the Precise Ammunition Department, MESKO
- Siemon Wezeman, Senior Researcher, Arms Transfers and Military Expenditure Programme, SIPRI
- Robin Mossinkoff, Head FSC Support Section, Conflict Prevention Centre, OSCE
- Availability and use of MANPADS
- Perceptions of threat
- Actions undertaken to address the issue
- Capacity of local governments and regional institutions to mitigate threat
- Outside assistance needed
- Matt Schroeder, Senior Researcher, Small Arms Survey
- David Diaz, Chief of Staff, Strategic Capacity Group
- David Diaz, Chief of Staff, Strategic Capacity Group
- Siemon Wezeman, Senior Researcher, Arms Transfers and Military Expenditure Programme, SIPRI
- Shang-Su Wu, Research Fellow, Military Studies Programme, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
- Andrei Serbin Pont, Research Director, La Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales (CRIES)
- Dr Nelson Alusala, Research consultant, Institute for Security Studies (ISS)
- Claudio Gramizzi, Head of Regional Operations - West Africa, Conflict Armament Research
- Dr Margarita Konaev,Non-Resident Fellow, Modern War Institute at West Point
Brussels, 1140 Belgium
Cooperating to implement the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Landmines and cluster munitions’ survivors : A testimony by Khun Wiboonrat Chanchoo (Thailand) « It is a great honour for me to be here today. As all of you are […]
Find out more »Landmines and cluster munitions’ survivors : A testimony by Khun Wiboonrat Chanchoo (Thailand)
« It is a great honour for me to be here today. As all of you are aware, I’m not a cluster munitions survivor, but landmine survivor. For me, there is no difference between cluster munitions and landmine survivors or other remnants of wars. We are the same. We are victims. I myself became person with disability nearly 20 years ago. That day, I went in to the forest near the Thai-Cambodian border to collect bamboo to bring home. I was not aware that there were landmines hidden in that area. All I well recalled was that all of a sudden there was loud noise and my body was catapulted into the air. When I looked at my left leg, I saw it was shattered with dangling fractured bones. I screamed to warn others not to come near while I crawled myself to safety. Though I did not lose my life, but life has changed dramatically after that. My husband by that time could not deal with it and felt ashamed of my physical condition so he abused me, abandoned me and left our family taking with him all the money and assets we had. But he left the most valuable assets for me, our two daughters. I have been sharing my story, which is of course not a pleasant one, several times. I am aware that sometimes people feel uncomfortable when listening. But I have to continue doing this because I would like people to really know the lives of survivors. It’s not like we received support one time and all have been done so that case can be closed. Not only survivors receive affect, but also our family members. There are too many people with disabilities who still have difficulties in their lives. Some of them are in worse conditions. They still need support. Some of them don’t even have rice on the table. After having accident, I did not give up, I continued working in the paddies and plots, growing rice and vegetables, and raising my two kids on my own. As time went on, I came to realise that a person with disability not only can live a normal life with the proper care and support from those around them; but they can also contribute meaningfully towards others. I decided to join a local support group for people with disabilities. It is a platform where we can work together to help improve our living conditions. Our self-help group started from small group of landmine survivors and people with disabilities in my village. The group expanded to neighbouring villages, and finally become a sub-district group. This group then connects with other survivors’ groups in other districts and provinces. My self-help group now comprises over 100 landmine survivors. Most recently, I have expanded the scope of my activities to include persons with various disabilities, orphans, children with HIV infected parents, and the abandoned elderly. Activities of our self-help groups in the past and at present include mushroom planting, micro-credit loan among group members, promotion of income generating activities, setting up a local network to deliver assistance is a much more efficient and sustainable approach in providing assistance, and more. Some activities become successful for example mushroom planting, but some are not successful including raising animals. After 20 years of being a person with disability, believe it or not, the needs of survivors I have been observing remain the same, which are very basic needs. Survivors need prostheses. Survivors need financial support and micro-credit. Survivors need to accessibility and modification of accommodation and public facilities for appropriate use by persons with disabilities. Survivors need to know about their rights. I would like to thank the Governments of Thailand for a lot of good work happening. My voices are louder. I would like also to thank other Governments including Lao PDR, Cambodia, Vietnam, and more for lots of good work happening in my survivors’ friends’ countries. We all know that government support and understanding for victims is vital to ensuring our full and equal participation in the society. I wish the international community continue working together to ensure that no one will have to suffer from this indiscriminate weapon ever again. I wish Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam acceding to the CCM very soon. We need protection of the rights of victims in an all-inclusive and sustainable manner. Aside from Government of Thailand, I would like to thank International Campaign to Ban Landmines-Cluster Munitions Coalition, Handicap International, Jesuit Refugee Services, COERR and Norwegian People’s Aid for supporting me all along. » Khun Wiboonrat Chanchoo, International Campaign to Ban Landmines - Cluster Munition Coalition, Thailand, 17 March 2017The closed seminar on “Cooperating to implement the Convention on Cluster Munitions: the country coalition concept” was held in conjunction with the Permanent Representation of Germany to the Conference on Disarmament. It was funded by the European Union and jointly organised by the European External Action Service through the EU Non-proliferation Consortium, and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP).
It took place on the premises of the UNESCAP, Bangkok, Thailand, on March 16 and 17, 2017. The participants included both government officials, International organizations representatives and non-governmental experts from the South-East Asia region, the EU member states and beyond. The purpose of this seminar was to discuss future developments impacting the implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM). It focused on the concept of establishing “country coalitions” (i.e. with a country specific focus) as a means to enhance international cooperation and thus support the implementation of the Convention in South-East Asia. A coordinated approach concerning destruction and clearance (including mapping and securing of contaminated areas) of cluster munitions and assisting victims, involving donor states and operators will support States Parties to fulfil their commitments under the Convention. Lastly, a country specific approach is required to help ensure progress in implementation of the CCM. Against this backdrop the concept of establishing “country coalitions” as a means to enhance international cooperation and thus promote the CCM seems to have considerable potential. The South-East Asia region is the location of the heaviest cluster munition contamination globally. It includes both States Parties and Non-States Parties to the CCM, including countries who are addressing contamination, stockpile destruction, etc. Within the region, Lao PDR, Vietnam and Cambodia are all dealing with very high levels of contamination. Lao PDR has the highest levels of contamination. The seminar consisted of five sessions: Session 1 offered to all the countries of the region the opportunity to share their perception of the issue (risks and threats, entry into force and implementation of the CCM, etc.). Session 2 focused on cooperation and assistance by introducing the country coalition concept, discussing and refining this approach. The relevant actors for such a coalition would include representatives of: the affected country, donor states, international organizations, operators on the ground and other relevant experts, such as the GICHD. Session 3 addressed the issue of the cooperation and assistance by introducing the country coalition concept. Session 4 and 5 explored the practical implications of the country coalition concept on the challenge of article 4 obligations and on victim assistance.Agenda
Thursday 16 March 2017
09:00 - 09:15 | Welcome and Introduction – Setting the scene |
Michael Biontino (Germany) Frank Meeussen (EEAS/EU) Benjamin Hautecouverture (France/EUNPC) | |
09:15 – 11:15 | Session 1: Challenges of Cluster Munition Remnants contamination in the region |
Chair & Introduction: Megan Burke (CMC) Cambodia Lao PDR Malaysia The Philippines Sri Lanka Thailand | |
11:15 – 11:30 | Coffee Break |
11:30 – 12:45 | Session 2: Introducing the country coalition concept |
Chair: Benjamin Hautecouverture (France/EUNPC) Speaker 1 Michael Biontino (Germany) Speaker 2 Megan Burke (CMC) | |
12:45 – 14:00 | Lunch |
14:30 – 16:30 | Session 3: Cooperation and assistance - The connection between affected countries and donor countries – Best practices in coordination/cooperation |
Chair: Frank Meeussen (EEAS/EU) Speaker 1 Genevieve Clune (Australia) Speaker 2 Khampheng Douangthongla (Lao PDR) Speaker 3 Vidya Abhayagunawardena (Sri Lanka Campaign to Ban Landmines) | |
18:30 – 21:00 | Reception, German residence |
Friday 17 March 2017
09:00 – 10:00 | Session 4: Practical implications 1 - Victim assistance |
Chair: Aksel Steen-Nilsen (NPA Programme Director, Cambodia) Speaker 1 JJuan Carlos Ruan (Ottawa ISU) Speaker 2 Sheila Mweemba (CCM-ISU) Speaker 3 Benoit Couturier (Handicap International Lao PDR) | |
10:00 – 11:00 | Session 5: Practical implications 2 – Clearance |
Chair: Maarten Broekhof (The Netherlands) Speaker 1 Maarten Broekhof (The Netherlands) Speaker 2 Touch Pheap (Cambodia) Speaker 3 Bounpheng Sisawath (Lao PDR) | |
11:00 – 11:15 | Coffee Break |
11:30 – 12:30 | Wrap up and recommendations |
Sandra de Waele (EU) Balasubramaniam Murali (UNDP – Lao PDR) Stefano Toscano (GICHD) Benjamin Hautecouverture (France/EUNPC) | |
12:30 – 13:30 | Farewell lunch |
Bangkok, Thaïlande
Developments in SALW Technology and Design: Implications for Countering Diversion
The EU Non-proliferation Consortium organised a one-day expert seminar on “Developments in SALW-technology: implications for countering diversion”, on 7 March 2017 in Brussels. Preventing diversion of Small Arms and Light […]
Find out more »The EU Non-proliferation Consortium organised a one-day expert seminar on “Developments in SALW-technology: implications for countering diversion”, on 7 March 2017 in Brussels.
Preventing diversion of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) is a key priority for the international community in preventing violent conflicts and gun enabled crimes. The seminar included presentations and discussions on ‘Risks of diversion’, ‘Marking and tracing’, ‘Stockpile management’ and ‘End-use controls’. It built upon the outcomes of the 2015 Meeting of Governmental Experts on the Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on SALW. The discussions will feed into the review of the EU SALW Strategy as well as preparations for the 2018 Review Conference of the UN Programme of Action on SALW. The seminar brought together 40 participants from European industry, EU and EU member state officials, regional and international organizations, and research institutes.Agenda
09:00–09:15 | Welcome and introduction to the seminar |
Pawel Herczynski, Director Security Policy and Conflict Prevention, European External Action Service Mark Bromley, Co-Director of the Dual-use and Arms Trade Programme, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute | |
09:15–10:30 | Session 1 — Diversion: causes, consequences and risk mitigation |
Chair: Frank Meeussen, Alternate Chair of COARM Council Working Party, European External Action Service
Speaker: Savannah de Tessières, Senior Consultant, Small Arms Survey and United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations
Speaker: Tarmo Dix, Desk Officer Conventional Arms Control, German Federal Foreign Office
Speaker: N. R. Jenzen-Jones, Director, Armament Research Services
This session will explore the legal and normative standards to prevent diversion; recent cases of diversion following exports of SALW from Europe; and means to counter diversion, including the opportunities and challenges generated by emerging SALW technologies and designs.
Key questions that will be addressed
|
|
10:45–12:00 | Session 2 — Developments in SALW technology and design: implications for marking and tracing |
Chair: Lina Grip, Researcher, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Speaker: Dr. Giacomo Persi Paoli, Research Leader, RAND Europe
Speaker: Thierry Jacobs, Strategic Projects and Relations Executive, Fabrique Nationale d’Herstal
Speaker: Dr. Gernot Schrems, Laser Expert, Trotec Laser GmbH
This session will explore the current state of the art with regard to available technologies for marking and tracing SALW and related ammunition; the challenges and opportunities posed by developments in modular design, polymer materials and additive manufacturing and how they can be met; and options for states to promote the use of new marking techniques.
Key questions that will be addressed
|
|
13:15–14:30 | Session 3 — Developments in SALW technology and design: implications for stockpile management |
Chair: Pilar Reina, Independent consultant
Speaker: Alain Lapon, Chief Technical Officer, South Eastern and Eastern European Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons
Speaker: Diman Dimov, Project Support Office, Conflict Prevention Centre, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
Speaker: Robert Kondor, Regional Sales Director, Dynamit Nobel Defence
This session will explore the current state of the art with regard to available technologies for tagging and tracking SALW shipments and stockpiles to facilitate secure stockpile management; the role these systems can play in preventing SALW diversion; and options for states to promote the use of these technologies.
Key questions that will be addressed
|
|
14:30–15:45 | Session 4 — Developments in SALW technology and design: implications for end-use controls |
Chair: Elvan Isikozlu, Researcher, Bonn International Center for Conversion
Speaker: Matt Schroeder, Senior Researcher, Small Arms Survey
Speaker: Dr. Georg Jahnen, Head of Development, Armatix
This session will explore the current state of the art with regard to available technologies for enabling and/or disabling SALW; other technologies that can help to prevent the post shipment diversion of SALW; and options for states to promote the use of these technologies.
Key questions that will be addressed
|
|
15:45–16:00 | Summary of the day’s discussions and links with EU and UN-level processes |
Frank Meeussen, alternate chair of COARM Council Working Party, European External Action Service Dr. Ali Arbia, Project Manager, Small Arms Survey |
Brussels, B- 1040
EU – Republic of Korea Non-Proliferation Seminar on the nuclear and ballistic dimensions of the DPRK crisis
The European Union and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea co-sponsored a seminar on the nuclear and ballistic missile dimensions of the DPRK crisis, which took […]
Find out more »The European Union and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea co-sponsored a seminar on the nuclear and ballistic missile dimensions of the DPRK crisis, which took place in Seoul on 24-25 October 2016. The seminar was co-hosted by the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium (EUNPC), the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security (IFANS), the Korea National Diplomatic Academy (KNDA) and the Korea Nuclear Policy Society (KNPS).
The seminar brought together some 60 participants from governments and think-tanks in Europe, North-East Asia and the United States. Participants shared their assessment of the DPRK nuclear and ballistic programmes, reiterating their grave concern about the threat that this programme constitutes to regional and international stability. Participants also shared their views on how the international community, including the EU, should best respond to the persistent violation by the DPRK of multiple UN Security Council Resolutions. They discussed in particular the effectiveness of a diplomatic response, including sanctions, as well as counter-proliferation solutions and options. Participants agreed that the seminar had provided a very useful opportunity for sharing views and assessments. They expressed the hope that the dialogue and exchange on this issue would continue, including in the framework of the bilateral relations between the EU and the Republic of Korea.Agenda
Monday 24 October 2016
Welcome and introduction | |
09:30 - 09:45 | Welcome and Introduction to the meeting |
SHIN Dong-ik, President, IFANS, ROK Ambassador Gerhard Sabathil, Head of EU Delegation in the Republic of Korea, EU Benjamin Hautecouverture, Senior research fellow, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique (FRS), France | |
09:45 - 11:50 | Session 1: The DPRK nuclear and ballistic programmes: what assessment? |
12:30 - 13:00 | Keynote speech |
Session 2: The international community’s response: approaches and effectiveness | |
13:00 - 14:30 | The diplomatic answer (including the sanctions) |
14:50 - 16:20 | The counter-proliferation solutions and options |
Session 3: What more can be done or how different? | |
16:40 - 18:40 | Leverage and new room for action |
Thursday 25 October 2016
Session 4: Summary and Recommendations | |
09:00 - 11:00 | A specific role for the EU? |
11:20- 12:20 | Wrap-up and Recommendations |
Closing of the meeting | |
12:20 - 12:35 | SHIN Dong-ik, President, IFANS, ROK Bruno Hanses, Senior Expert Disarmament, non-proliferation and arms export control, European External Action Service, EU Benjamin Hautecouverture, FRS, France |
Preparing for the 2015 NPT Review Conference
International seminar © FRS Hosted by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and supported by the European Union Co-organized by The Algerian Institut Diplomatique et des Relations Internationales and the […]
Find out more »International seminar
[caption id="attachment_6133" align="alignleft" width="318"] © FRS Hosted by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and supported by the European Union Co-organized by The Algerian Institut Diplomatique et des Relations Internationales and the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium/Fondation pour la recherche stratégique Sheraton Hotel, Algiers, 8-9 April 2015[/caption]An international seminar on “Preparing for the 2015 NPT Review Conference,” (RevCon) co-organized by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium (EUNPC - Fondation pour la recherche stratégique, Paris, France), was held at the Sheraton hotel, near Algiers (Algeria), on 8 and 9 April 2015. The event was supported by the EU.
About 50 people attended the seminar: over 20 countries were represented, many at the ambassadorial levels. The ONUDA and the IAEA were represented. The president of the 2015 Revcon was present, along with the chairs of the three main committees of the Revcon. Five experts from the EUNPC and one nongovernmental expert from the Middle East gave presentations and/or moderated sessions. It was recognized that the 2015 NPT RevCon would be difficult because of inadequate implementation of the 2010 action plan. Yet the interim deal between Iran and the E3+3/EU (the Lausanne agreement) was perceived as an opportunity to create a positive atmosphere because it strengthens the NPT and shows that nonproliferation tools work. The cornerstone of the EU non-proliferation strategy (“effective multilateralism”) was recalled and its approach to the 2015 Revcon was detailed. Most of the challenges facing the RevCon were developed during session I (“Challenges and opportunities for the 2015 NPT Review Conference”). Session II (“Achieving progress on nuclear disarmament, including new approaches”) was marked by constructive propositions. It was stated that peaceful uses of nuclear energy (Session III) are crucial for social and economic development. Contribution of the Nuclear Weapon Free Zones to Non-Proliferation and Disarmament was detailed in Session IV. The success of the Nuclear Free Zones (NFZ) as a cross-cutting tool and issue for the NPT regime was recognized by the participants. Lastly, session V dealt with various aspects concerning the reinforcement of the NPT Review Process: institutional, procedural, substantive.Agenda
Wednesday, April 8th 2015
9h00 - 9h45 | Opening Session |
Statement by Representative of Algeria Statement by Ambassador Jacek Bylica, Special Envoy EEAS, EU Statement by Representative of UN Office of Disarmament Affairs | |
9h45 - 10h00 | Coffee break |
10h00-11h30 | Session I - Challenges and opportunities for the 2015 NPT Review Conference |
Moderator: Representative of Algeria Panel: Representative of UK Mr. Ayman Khalil, Director, ACSIS, Jordan Representative of Algeria | |
11h30 - 11h45 | Coffee break |
11h45 - 13h00 | Session II – Nuclear disarmament |
Moderator: Bruno Tertrais, Senior Research Fellow, FRS, France Panel: Representative of Algeria Representative of Japan Ambassador Enrique-Roman Moray, President of Main Committee I Mr. Mark Fitzpatrick, IISS, EUNPC | |
13h00 - 14h30 | Lunch |
14h30 - 16h00 | Session III - Peaceful uses of nuclear energy |
Moderator: Mr. Benjamín Hautecouverture, Senior Research Fellow, FRS, France Panel: Representative of Iran Ambassador David Stuart, President of Main Committee III Representative of the IAEA Mr. Vitaly Fedchenko, SIPRI, Sweden | |
16h00 - 16h15 | Coffee break |
16h15 - 18h15 | Session IV - Contribution of the Nuclear Weapon Free Zones to Non-Proliferation and Disarmament |
Moderator: Representative of Egypt Panel: Representative of South Africa Representative of Mexico Ambassador Cristian Istrate, President of Main Committee II Representative of Finland | |
18h30 | Welcome reception |
Thursday, April 9th 2015
10h00 - 11h30 | Session V: Strengthening the NPT Review Process |
Moderator: Representative of Algeria Panel: Representative of Cuba Representative of UN Office of Disarmament Affairs Mr. Benjamin Hautecouverture, Senior Research Fellow, FRS, France | |
11h30-12h00 | Closing session |
Ambassador Jacek Bylica, Special Envoy EEAS, EU Ambassador Taous Feroukhi of Algeria, the President-designate of the 2015 NPT Review Conference Mr. Mark Fitzpatrick, Director, IISS Non-proliferation and Disarmament Programme / Vice-Chairman, EUNPC |
European Forum Alpbach, Austria – “Nuclear Futures?”
EU-organised retreat assesses future of nuclear power and related non-proliferation issues. At an EU retreat in Alpbach, Austria on 23-25 August, three dozen experts from academia, industry and international organisations […]
Find out more »EU-organised retreat assesses future of nuclear power and related non-proliferation issues.
At an EU retreat in Alpbach, Austria on 23-25 August, three dozen experts from academia, industry and international organisations assessed future developments impacting the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Held in conjunction with the European Forum Alpbach, the seminar on ‘Nuclear Futures?’ concluded that nuclear power will continue to be a significant part of the global energy panorama, particularly in non-OECD Asia. Nuclear energy can help ensure energy security and meet rising energy demands and greenhouse gas emission targets. While renewable sources will make an increasingly larger contribution, particularly if a way can be found to store solar and wind energy, technological advancements may also help overcome the serious problems associated with nuclear power. Indeed, how to ensure that nuclear power is provided safely, securely and without abetting nuclear-weapons programmes was the dominant theme of the event. Each aspect of the ‘3S’ framework – safeguards, safety and security – was discussed at length, as well as the role of export controls in ensuring the proper use of nuclear-related trade. Following the 2.5-day retreat, several of the participants led a public break-out session at the Alpbach Political Symposium to present an overview of nuclear energy forecasts and the challenges it entails. Three separate units of the European Union joined forces in funding and organising the seminar: the European External Action Service through the EU Non-proliferation Consortium, the Development and Cooperation – EuropeAid Directorate-General (DEVCO) of the European Commission, and the Commission’s Joint Research Center (JRC). Administrative arrangements were handled by the German Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA) through its DEVCO-funded program on ‘EU-Outreach in Export Control of Dual-Use Items‘.Documents
EU Consortium Middle East Workshop
Capacity-building Workshop for mid-level Diplomats in support of the Helsinki Conference on a Middle East WMD Free Zone In 2011 and 2012, the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium organised two international seminars […]
Find out more »Capacity-building Workshop for mid-level Diplomats in support of the Helsinki Conference on a Middle East WMD Free Zone
In 2011 and 2012, the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium organised two international seminars in support of a process aimed at establishing a Zone Free of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDFZ) in the Middle East. The 2011 and 2012 seminars proved successful in bringing parties together and exploring key issues. The EU decided to sponsor a related event in 2014 as a practical contribution to the Helsinki Conference. Organised by our Consortium, a capacity-building workshop was held on the 18th and 19th June 2014 in Brussels, bringing together mid-level diplomats from the region for presentations on zones elsewhere and building blocks of multilateral diplomacy, along with a simulation exercise.Agenda
Report
Interactive briefings
- African Nuclear Weapon Free Zone (Pelindaba Treaty) - Case Study: History and Applicable Lessons, by Thomas Markram (UN Office for Disarmament Affairs)
- Security and Confidence-Building Measures Elsewhere, by Ambassador Rüdiger Lüdeking (Permanent Representative of the Federal Republic of Germany to the OSCE)
- Methodology, History, Tools of Multilateral Negotiations, by Ambassador Arend Meerburg (The Netherlands)
- CBMs in Southeast Asia, by Mark Fitzpatrick (IISS)
- Establishing a WMDFZ in the Middle East, by Tariq Rauf (SIPRI)
Documents
Brussels, B-1210
Enhancing compliance of the BTWC
EU Support of the Arms Trade Treaty Negotiations
Council Decision 2013/43/CFSP, adopted on the 22nd January 2013, tasks the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium with the organization of two closed seminars bringing together 30 to 40 governmental experts in order to […]
Find out more »Seminar 1
Seminar 2
Draft Treaty
The draft of the Arms Trade Treaty, United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, New York, 2-27 July 2012, July 26, 2012EU Documents
- Council Decision 2013/43/CFSP on continued Union activities in support of the Arms Trade Treaty negotiations, in the framework of the European Security Strategy, January 22, 2013
- Opening Statement of the EU at the UN Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, United Nations, New York, July 2, 2012
- Statement of the EU at the Preparatory Committee for the Arms Trade Treaty on Final Provisions of the Arms Trade Treaty, United Nations, New York, July 13, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Preparatory Committee for the Arms Trade Treaty on Specific Aspects of the Implementation Mechanism of the Arms Trade Treaty, United Nations, New York, July 12, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Preparatory Committee for the Arms Trade Treaty on Transparency Provisions and Implementation Support Unit of the Arms Trade Treaty, United Nations, New York, July 12, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Preparatory Committee for the Arms Trade Treaty on General Aspects of the Implementation Mechanism of the Arms Trade Treaty, United Nations, New York, July 11, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – General Comments on the Revised Chair’s Draft Paper, New York, March 4, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – General Comments on the Revised Chair’s Draft Paper, New York, March 3, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – International Cooperation and Assistance, New York, March 2, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – Parameters of an Arms Trade Treaty, New York, March 1, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – Scope of an Arms Trade Treaty, New York, February 28, 2011
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – On International Cooperation and Assistance, New York, July 21, 2010
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – On the Implementation and Application of the Arms Trade Treaty, New York, July 19, 2010
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – On the Scope of an ATT, New York, July 15, 2010
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – On the Chair’s Draft Elements of an Arms Trade Treaty, New York, July 15, 2010
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – On Chair’s Draft Principles, New York, July 15, 2010
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – On the Principles Governing the Arms Trade Treaty, New York, July 14, 2010
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty – On the Elements of the Arms Trade Treaty, New York, July 13, 2010
- Statement of the EU at the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, New York, July 12, 2010
- Council Decision 2010/336/CFSP on EU activities in support of the Arms Trade Treaty, in the framework of the European Security Strategy, June 14, 2010
- Council Decision 2009/42/CFSP on support for EU activities in order to promote among third countries the process leading towards an Arms Trade Treaty, in the framework of the European Security Strategy, January 19, 2009
Publications of the Consortium
- Arms Trade Treaty assistance: identifying a role for the European Union, Mark Bromley and Paul Holtom, Non-Proliferation Discussion Paper, February 2014, 18p.
- The European Union's Involvement In Negotiating an Arms Trade Treaty, Sara Depauw, Non-Proliferation paper, No.23, December 2012, 16p.
Latest Publications from the Network
- Arms Trade Treaty: What prospects for 2013 after the failure of negotiations in July 2012?, Virginie Moreau, Note d'analyse, (in French) Group for research and information on peace and security – GRIP, December 3, 2012, 12p.
- Measuring International Arms Transfers, Paul Holtom, Mark Bromley, Verena Simmel, SIPRI Fact Sheet, December 2012, 8p., Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
- Arms Trade Treaty: EU priorities before March 2013 negotiations, Cédric Poitevin, Note d'analyse, Group for research and information on peace and security - GRIP, November 28, 2012, 4p.
- Implementing an Arms Trade Treaty: mapping assistance to strengthen arms transfer controls, Paul Holtom, Mark Bromley, SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security, No. 2012/2 July 2012, 20p., Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
- Un traité pour réguler les transferts d'armes : défis et opportunités, (in French), M.Finaud, GCSP Web Editorial, 26 June 2012
- A Treaty to Regulate Arms Transfers: Challenges and Opportunities, M.Finaud, GCSP Web Editorial, 25 June 2012
- The arms trade treaty. Challenges for 2012 (in French), Virginie Moreau, GRIP Rapport n° 2011/6, 37 pp.
- Technology transfers and the Arms Trade Treaty - Issues and Perspectives, Bruno Gruselle, Perrine Le Meur, in Recherches & Documents, No 2/2012, March 2012, 28p.
- Towards the 2012 Arms Trade Treaty Negotiation Conference, Wilton Park Conference, Conference report for WP1136, 6p., November 2011
- Import Controls and an Arms Trade Treaty, Mark Bromley and Paul Holtom, SIPRI Background Paper, July 2011
- Implementing an arms trade treaty: Lessons on Reporting and Monitoring from Existing Mechanisms, Paul Holtom and Mark Bromley, SIPRI Policy Paper No. 28, July 2011
- Transit and Trans-Shipment Controls in an Arms Trade Treaty, Paul Holtom and Mark Bromley , SIPRI Background Paper, July 2011
- Arms transfers to Zimbabwe: implications for an arms trade treaty, Lukas Jeuck, SIPRI Background Paper, 12 pp., March 2011
EU Consortium Middle East international seminars
First EU Consortium Middle East Seminar (July 2011) Seminar Background Papers The dynamics of missile proliferation in the Middle East and North Africa by Stéphane Delory Nuclear capabilities in the […]
Find out more »First EU Consortium Middle East Seminar (July 2011)
Seminar Background Papers
- The dynamics of missile proliferation in the Middle East and North Africa by Stéphane Delory
- Nuclear capabilities in the Middle East by Mark Fitzpatrick
- Peaceful uses of nuclear energy in the Middle East: multilateral approaches by Giorgio Franceschini and Daniel Müller
- A Zone free of WMD and means of delivery in the Middle East: an assessment of the multilateral diplomatic process, 1974–2010 by Benjamin Hautecouverture and Raphaëlle Mathiot
- The Arms Control and Regional Security Working Group: still relevant to the Middle East? by Peter Jones
- A weapons of mass destruction-free zone in the Middle East: an incremental approach by Harald Müller and Claudia Baumgart-Ochse
- Status of non-proliferation treaties, agreements, and other related instruments in the Middle East by David Santoro
- Conventional strategic military capabilities in the Middle East by Pieter D. Wezeman
Other Documents
- Agenda
- Final Assessment, by Camille Grand, Chairman of the EU Non-Proliferation Consortium
Second EU Consortium Middle East Seminar (November 2012)
Seminar Background Papers
- Making Peace Attractive: Negotiated Agreement between Israel and the Palestinians by Claudia Baumgart-Ochse
- Building Confidence over Biological Matters in the Middle East by Una Becker-Jakob
- A Middle East Zone free of Weapons of Mass Destruction – the subject of a Helsinki meeting projected for 2012 by Hans Blix
- The Middle East Regional Security Regime and CSBMs by Shlomo Brom
- Building confidence towards a MEWMDFZ via a Chemical Weapons ban by Dina Esfandiary
- The Regional Security Environment and Basic Principles for the Relations of the Members of the Zone by Nabil Fahmy
- Promoting nuclear safety and nuclear security in the Middle East region by Mark Fitzpatrick
- Towards WMDFZ in the Middle East: Biological Confidence-Building Measures by David Friedman
- A Top Down Approach to a Nuclear Weapons Free Zone in the Middle East by Pierre Goldschmidt
- Curbing missile proliferation in the Middle East: Options for a comprehensive policy by Bruno Gruselle
- A Middle East free of Missiles and Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Iranian View by Nasser Hadian
- The Regional Security Architecture and Other Confidence Building Measures by Peter Jones
- Conceptualizing CSBMs Proper Vehicles (DVs) Sector for the Middle East Conference (MEC) by Bernd W. Kubbig
- Assessing the relevance of nuclear CBMs to a WMD arms control process in the Middle East today by Emily Landau
- Reflection on ‘The Regional Security Environment and basic Principles for the Relations of the Members of the Zone’ by Ariel (Eli) Levite
- Tiptoe, stride and leap: steps towards a WMD- free Middle East by Patricia Lewis
- A Regional Arrangement on Securing Radiological Agents as a CSBM: Common Interest in Preventing Radiological Terrorism by Aviv Melamud and Nilsu Gören
- The Iran Nuclear Dilemma: The Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy and NPT’s Main Objectives by Seyed Hossein Mousavian
- Building Confidence vis-à-vis Transitional Egypt by Daniel Müller
- Basic principles for a process leading to the establishment of a Middle East Free of Weapons of Mass Destruction by Harald Müller
- Missiles and Other Means of Delivery in the Middle East by Uzi Rubin
- The Issue of ‘Delivery Systems’ in a Middle East Zone Free of Weapons of Mass Destruction by Carlo Trezza
- A think piece on confidence-building measures in the Middle East by Sinan Ülgen
- Biological and Chemical Weapons and the Prospective Disarmament Process in the Middle East by Jean Pascal Zanders
Other Documents
Seminar Agenda
Monday, 5 November, 2012
- 09:00 – 10:00 Accreditation, Coffee
- 10:00 – 10:15 Welcome
- 10:15 – 12:00
-
Plenary Session I: Parameters and Properties of a Zone free of WMD in the Middle East and Basic Principles for a Regional Security Architecture
10:15 – 11:00 Presentations 11:00 – 12:00 General Discussion - 12:00 – 14:00 Lunch
- 14:00 – 15:30
-
Breakout Sessions I: Confidence Building and Technical Measures in the Area of WMD and Means of Delivery
Nuclear Confidence Building and Technical Measures
14:00 – 14:30 Presentations 14:30 – 15:30 DiscussionBiological and Chemical Confidence Building and Technical Measures
14:00 – 14:30 Presentations 14:30 – 15:30 DiscussionMissiles and Other Means of Delivery
14:00 – 14:30 Presentations 14:30 – 15:30 Discussion - 15:30 – 16:00 Coffee
- 16:00 – 17:30
-
Breakout Sessions II: Confidence Building Measures Improving Regional Peace and Security
Improving the Regional Security Architecture and Other Confidence Building Measures
16:00 – 16:30 Presentations 16:30 – 17:30 DiscussionPeaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Safety and Security
16:00 – 16:30 Presentations 16:30 – 17:30 Discussion - 19:00 Cocktail
- 20:00 Dinner, Keynote Speech